WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:03.179
Hello and welcome to No Effort November,

00:00:03.179 --> 00:00:08.016
a series&nbsp;of videos for the month 
of November where no effort is made.

00:00:08.016 --> 00:00:11.221
And you know where I never make any effort?

00:00:11.221 --> 00:00:12.826
Washing my dishes.

00:00:12.826 --> 00:00:17.298
That's because I have an automatic 
dishwasher at home which does that for me!

00:00:17.298 --> 00:00:21.654
And when it comes to the detergent products 
which are sold for use in home&nbsp;dishwashers,

00:00:21.654 --> 00:00:23.354
I would like to say the following:

00:00:23.979 --> 00:00:27.046
I was right!

00:00:27.046 --> 00:00:29.605
And thanks to the work of a bunch of&nbsp;cool people,

00:00:29.605 --> 00:00:32.111
today I can prove it.

00:00:32.111 --> 00:00:33.450
How?

00:00:33.450 --> 00:00:35.002
With this.

00:00:35.002 --> 00:00:38.436
That's right. There's a new dishwasher powder&nbsp;in town!

00:00:38.436 --> 00:00:43.609
And I was... very slightly involved in its development.

00:00:43.609 --> 00:00:47.307
Now, of course, I will tell you where&nbsp;
and how you can get your hands on this,

00:00:47.307 --> 00:00:51.428
but this video isn't just
 to announce the existence of a&nbsp;new product.

00:00:51.428 --> 00:00:58.343
You see, sending this formulation to an 
independent testing lab has vindicated all of&nbsp;my hot takes

00:00:58.343 --> 00:01:04.429
and crotchety Midwestern stubbornness 
when it comes to pre-dosed dishwasher pods and&nbsp;tablets.

00:01:04.429 --> 00:01:09.039
And because of that, I would very much like to 
tell you the story of how this came to be

00:01:09.039 --> 00:01:15.257
and what we have learned through sending it 
and some big name products through blind ASTM testing.

00:01:15.257 --> 00:01:21.879
I'll also show you why it's so important for those of us in 
North America to purge the cold water&nbsp;from the pipes

00:01:21.879 --> 00:01:28.074
by running the kitchen faucet until the water 
comes out piping hot before starting&nbsp;the dishwasher.

00:01:28.074 --> 00:01:32.061
I've only ever explained that 
and never demonstrated the difference it makes.

00:01:32.061 --> 00:01:34.440
And I've cooked up a great demo to show you.

00:01:34.440 --> 00:01:38.621
It involves temperature logging 
and copious amounts&nbsp;of peanut butter.

00:01:38.621 --> 00:01:40.000
So, stick around for that!

00:01:40.334 --> 00:01:42.939
But first, let's talk detergent.

00:01:42.939 --> 00:01:49.352
For those of you who&nbsp;may not be familiar with 
why I strongly prefer loose powders for dishwashers,

00:01:49.352 --> 00:01:55.447
well, quite simply,&nbsp;that's because the standard washing program 
in the vast majority of dishwashers out there

00:01:55.447 --> 00:01:59.934
is designed&nbsp;to accommodate two separate doses of detergent.

00:01:59.934 --> 00:02:03.662
A small one first and a bigger one later.

00:02:03.662 --> 00:02:05.111
Why might&nbsp;that be?

00:02:05.111 --> 00:02:08.859
Well, you know that little compartment 
you're supposed to put the detergent in?

00:02:08.859 --> 00:02:17.069
The&nbsp;entire reason your dishwasher has that thing is so that it can delay when detergent gets added to the&nbsp;washing water.

00:02:17.069 --> 00:02:20.640
It wants to do that because when the machine starts washing,

00:02:20.640 --> 00:02:24.651
food particles which&nbsp;dissolve 
easily in water like sugars and syrups,

00:02:24.651 --> 00:02:30.661
or that are easily knocked off your dirty&nbsp;dishes, like those chunks of tomato and the sauce from your pasta dinner,

00:02:30.661 --> 00:02:35.288
will cause the water&nbsp;inside 
the dishwasher to get dirty very quickly.

00:02:35.288 --> 00:02:40.629
And this means your dishwasher will have to 
drain&nbsp;that water out and replace it with clean water

00:02:40.629 --> 00:02:46.503
after a relatively short period of time,
 often&nbsp;just 10 or 15 minutes.

00:02:46.503 --> 00:02:52.418
That initial fill of water is called the pre-wash because it happens before&nbsp;the wash.

00:02:52.418 --> 00:02:56.632
It will handle the easiest to clean stuff, but that's it.

00:02:56.632 --> 00:03:01.830
And so it's the detergent&nbsp;dispenser's job to make sure 
the product you added to the machine

00:03:01.830 --> 00:03:07.725
so it can mix with the water and&nbsp;create a cleaning solution to tackle the really difficult stuck on food

00:03:07.725 --> 00:03:12.312
doesn't get sent down the&nbsp;
drain right away with the pre-wash water.

00:03:12.312 --> 00:03:14.451
That's the whole point of the dispenser!

00:03:14.451 --> 00:03:18.815
The dishwasher&nbsp;needs to control 
when the detergent actually gets released.

00:03:18.815 --> 00:03:26.566
And in doing so, it can assure there's&nbsp;
detergent in the water during the longest, hottest part of its wash program.

00:03:26.566 --> 00:03:29.125
Now, here's my&nbsp;little bugaboo:

00:03:29.125 --> 00:03:31.709
the pre-wash water can do a lot,

00:03:31.709 --> 00:03:38.280
but some food soils, particularly oils and fats,&nbsp;
don't like to mix with plain water.

00:03:38.280 --> 00:03:45.123
And because of that little incompatibility problem, 
those soils&nbsp;will be relatively unaffected by the pre-wash.

00:03:45.123 --> 00:03:52.807
But, what if you were to put a little extra&nbsp;detergent 
in the machine outside of the dispenser?

00:03:52.807 --> 00:04:00.010
That detergent would mix with the pre-wash water&nbsp;and thus it would allow it to absorb those fats and oils right away.

00:04:00.010 --> 00:04:03.517
Then when the machine drains&nbsp;the pre-wash water away,

00:04:03.517 --> 00:04:12.697
at least some of the fats and oils on your plates will have left the machine&nbsp;before the main part of the wash cycle has even begun.

00:04:12.697 --> 00:04:17.028
That's going to reduce 
the amount of work&nbsp;the main wash detergent has to do,

00:04:17.028 --> 00:04:20.933
potentially allowing for a smaller main wash dose.

00:04:20.933 --> 00:04:25.193
Well, it&nbsp;turns out 
that's exactly what you're supposed to be doing!

00:04:25.193 --> 00:04:28.690
Notice how this detergent dispenser&nbsp;has two cups.

00:04:28.690 --> 00:04:31.056
One is labeled main wash,

00:04:31.056 --> 00:04:34.397
and the other smaller cup says pre-wash.

00:04:34.397 --> 00:04:37.869
The pre-wash&nbsp;cup isn't actually sealed by the lid.

00:04:37.869 --> 00:04:39.854
In fact, it's got holes in the lid

00:04:39.854 --> 00:04:46.569
so whatever you put&nbsp;in there is just going to fall right out 
once you close the door and mix with the pre-wash water.

00:04:46.569 --> 00:04:51.856
Sometimes instead of two separate cups like this, 
you'll find a little divot for extra detergent.

00:04:51.856 --> 00:04:58.228
And other times, you won't find a marked spot for it 
because dishwasher manufacturers have, for some&nbsp;reason,

00:04:58.228 --> 00:05:02.859
decided to stop helping people 
understand what their machines actually do.

00:05:02.859 --> 00:05:08.878
And if they&nbsp;make any mention of pre-wash detergent at all, 
it's buried in the owner's manual somewhere.

00:05:08.878 --> 00:05:13.730
But let me just state this plainly: 
If your dishwasher has a detergent dispenser,

00:05:13.730 --> 00:05:15.729
which I'm&nbsp;fairly certain it does,

00:05:15.729 --> 00:05:20.855
then it's going to be doing a pre-wash 
on at least some of its cycles.

00:05:20.855 --> 00:05:25.626
Because if it didn't, there would be no reason 
for that detergent dispenser to be there!

00:05:25.626 --> 00:05:29.212
It would&nbsp;just have a spot which says, "Put detergent here."

00:05:29.212 --> 00:05:35.133
You know if they could get away with removing&nbsp;that costly moving part, they absolutely would.

00:05:35.200 --> 00:05:41.176
But they haven't because the fundamentals of&nbsp;
automatic dishwashing have not changed.

00:05:41.176 --> 00:05:48.447
Yet, most detergent products on the market today by&nbsp;forcing people into a single predetermined dosing&nbsp;structure

00:05:48.447 --> 00:05:50.413
disrespect those fundamentals.

00:05:50.413 --> 00:05:55.200
And that&nbsp;is just one of the reasons 
I'm so cranky about the dang pods.

00:05:55.200 --> 00:05:59.067
That's why I made my first video on&nbsp;dishwashers.

00:05:59.067 --> 00:06:02.738
There's a lot of people out there 
who think dishwashers can't clean well,

00:06:02.738 --> 00:06:07.385
often to the&nbsp;point of 
refusing to use them even if they have one at home.

00:06:07.385 --> 00:06:13.109
Yet, I have never had a dishwasher&nbsp;
which couldn't clean practically anything I threw at it!

00:06:13.109 --> 00:06:16.850
And I've used all kinds: 
from old machines&nbsp;from the early '90s

00:06:16.850 --> 00:06:19.422
to landlord specials of various vintages

00:06:19.422 --> 00:06:21.826
to mediocre machines like this Frigidaire

00:06:21.826 --> 00:06:25.979
and to high-end machines 
like the KitchenAid I now have at home.

00:06:25.979 --> 00:06:28.108
And with just a single exception,

00:06:28.108 --> 00:06:33.479
all it took to get great results was using cheap store-brand powders,

00:06:33.479 --> 00:06:39.811
using them as the machines&nbsp;expected with a little bit of pre-wash detergent in addition to the main detergent dose

00:06:39.811 --> 00:06:42.939
and&nbsp;selecting the normal wash cycle.

00:06:42.939 --> 00:06:49.617
The single "bad" machine in my life required the use of&nbsp;its heavy wash cycle for consistent results,

00:06:49.617 --> 00:06:53.236
but it could still wash great so long as you&nbsp;selected that.

00:06:53.236 --> 00:07:00.821
And hence explains my skepticism that the supposedly superior pods are really&nbsp;any better or worth the extra cost.

00:07:00.821 --> 00:07:02.687
Yet, after making those videos,

00:07:02.687 --> 00:07:09.087
while many people reported&nbsp;that switching to powder and using some pre-wash detergent made a huge difference for them,

00:07:09.087 --> 00:07:16.319
others&nbsp;couldn't get satisfactory results with powder 
but could with the higher-end detergent pods out&nbsp;there.

00:07:16.319 --> 00:07:19.770
The biggest issue seemed to be 
a residue left at the end of the wash.

00:07:19.770 --> 00:07:23.193
That can be a sign&nbsp;of using too much detergent,

00:07:23.193 --> 00:07:27.708
but when the same people reported 
they don't have that problem with&nbsp;pods...

00:07:27.708 --> 00:07:33.614
well, that gives some credence 
to the idea that the pods are a superior product.

00:07:33.614 --> 00:07:35.426
But here's&nbsp;my issue:

00:07:35.426 --> 00:07:37.942
Detergents are just chemicals!

00:07:37.942 --> 00:07:41.413
The way those chemicals are packaged shouldn't matter,

00:07:41.413 --> 00:07:46.250
especially in a dishwasher 
which violently churns up the water as it runs.

00:07:46.250 --> 00:07:52.624
And lots of pods&nbsp;out there are nothing more 
than a small quantity of powder in a dissolvable membrane.

00:07:52.624 --> 00:07:56.628
So if loose&nbsp;powders perform worse than pods,

00:07:56.628 --> 00:08:01.302
that's probably because the manufacturers want them to.

00:08:01.302 --> 00:08:03.956
Which&nbsp;brings me back to this.

00:08:03.956 --> 00:08:08.394
When I was working with Good Store 
on the Technology Connections socks&nbsp;campaign

00:08:08.394 --> 00:08:11.906
(which by the way, thank you 
so much to everyone who purchased them.

00:08:11.906 --> 00:08:18.357
Numbers aren't&nbsp;final yet, but it's looking like we'll have raised close to $200,000 for the Maternal Center of&nbsp;Excellence,

00:08:18.357 --> 00:08:19.446
which is awesome!

00:08:19.446 --> 00:08:22.154
And by the way, it just had its ribbon cutting.

00:08:22.154 --> 00:08:27.186
Truly, thank you all&nbsp;so much 
and I can't wait for the socks to start arriving at your door).

00:08:27.733 --> 00:08:28.708
...

00:08:29.255 --> 00:08:32.049
Okay, that was too long&nbsp;of a parenthetical, so let me restart.

00:08:32.049 --> 00:08:37.290
When I was working with Good Store, 
an old idea of John Green's&nbsp;was resurrected.

00:08:37.290 --> 00:08:40.201
Back in 2022, John contacted me and said,

00:08:40.201 --> 00:08:46.885
"You know what would be funny? If you&nbsp;made your own dishwasher detergent and we sold it to raise money for charity."

00:08:46.885 --> 00:08:53.302
I frikkin loved that&nbsp;idea, but we weren't sure how to pull it off so we decided to shove it for a while.

00:08:53.302 --> 00:08:59.466
Fast forward&nbsp;a few years and Good Store now exists 
and they've been selling eco-friendly cleaning products

00:08:59.466 --> 00:09:04.010
in&nbsp;partnership with Green Llama 
to raise money for the Coral Reef Alliance.

00:09:04.010 --> 00:09:06.899
While they were offering&nbsp;dishwasher tablets,

00:09:06.899 --> 00:09:11.245
lots of people were writing in to ask for a powder option.

00:09:11.245 --> 00:09:13.800
Weird. I wonder&nbsp;why that might be.

00:09:13.800 --> 00:09:16.614
Maybe they saw some YouTube videos.

00:09:16.614 --> 00:09:18.697
So, since the demand was there,

00:09:18.697 --> 00:09:20.877
I got&nbsp;connected with Matt Keasey.

00:09:20.877 --> 00:09:25.435
And after explaining my whole deal 
and the importance of the pre-wash,

00:09:25.435 --> 00:09:29.875
he was excited to work on his own loose powder formulation.

00:09:29.875 --> 00:09:32.978
And this is the result of his work.

00:09:32.978 --> 00:09:35.752
And folks, this is fantastic.

00:09:35.752 --> 00:09:39.467
And best of all, you don't have to take my word for it.

00:09:39.467 --> 00:09:46.635
See, the&nbsp;team at Green Llama wasn't satisfied with simply coming up with a great formulation and calling&nbsp;it done.

00:09:46.635 --> 00:09:50.737
Matt arranged for independent, blinded ASTM testing

00:09:50.737 --> 00:09:54.923
where this product was put through 
a&nbsp;series of standardized scientific tests

00:09:54.923 --> 00:09:59.072
to measure its cleaning 
performance in several food stain&nbsp;categories.

00:09:59.072 --> 00:10:02.357
And it was compared against both a big name powder

00:10:02.357 --> 00:10:07.692
and the most premium detergent&nbsp;pod 
on offer by the same big name brand.

00:10:07.692 --> 00:10:11.306
The tests revealed two very interesting things.

00:10:11.306 --> 00:10:17.905
First,&nbsp;the powder that big name brand sells 
is in fact worse at cleaning than their pods.

00:10:17.905 --> 00:10:22.814
So, you are at&nbsp;least getting a better product 
when you buy their more expensive option.

00:10:22.814 --> 00:10:25.575
Which is good... I guess.

00:10:25.575 --> 00:10:32.443
But&nbsp;second, we also confirmed my long-held suspicion that the performance difference between Big Powder&nbsp;and Big Pod

00:10:32.443 --> 00:10:38.608
has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that 
one is a powder and one is a fancy pants&nbsp;pod.

00:10:38.608 --> 00:10:46.772
Because you see, Matt's powder formulation meets or exceeds the cleaning performance&nbsp;of the best pods that brand sells

00:10:46.772 --> 00:10:49.099
in nearly every category tested.

00:10:49.099 --> 00:10:54.985
The only test where this&nbsp;lost to the pod was 
the tea stain removal test, but it came in second.

00:10:54.985 --> 00:11:01.331
And the overall score for&nbsp;this formulation 
was slightly higher than the pod it was tested against.

00:11:01.331 --> 00:11:04.516
So, this is good stuff.

00:11:04.516 --> 00:11:09.509
Oh,&nbsp;and for the folks out there who have had problems 
with powders leaving some kind of residue,

00:11:09.509 --> 00:11:13.846
well,&nbsp;part of the testing procedure 
evaluated spotting and filming.

00:11:13.846 --> 00:11:20.182
And sure enough, Matt's formulation&nbsp;
is just as good as that brand name pod.

00:11:20.182 --> 00:11:22.695
No spotting was observed at all,

00:11:22.695 --> 00:11:27.320
and when it comes&nbsp;to filming, 
this got a slightly better score than the brand name.

00:11:27.320 --> 00:11:32.978
It's almost like powders actually&nbsp;
can be excellent detergent products or something!

00:11:32.978 --> 00:11:35.563
I have also tested this myself, of course -

00:11:35.563 --> 00:11:37.165
Yeah, that's right.

00:11:37.165 --> 00:11:40.950
I got early access to a dishwasher detergent formulation.

00:11:40.950 --> 00:11:44.668
Way cooler than&nbsp;something boring 
like the latest phone or laptop.

00:11:46.160 --> 00:11:52.850
Anyway, Matt's formulation passed my standard several-days-old-dried-out-cheese-and-bean-dip challenge with flying colors,

00:11:52.850 --> 00:11:58.102
and it took care of&nbsp;that hazelnut spread container, 
too, along with everything else in the machine.

00:11:58.102 --> 00:12:00.856
In fact, after&nbsp;using this a few times,

00:12:00.856 --> 00:12:07.051
I am pretty confident this is the best 
dishwasher detergent product&nbsp;I have personally used.

00:12:07.051 --> 00:12:13.706
Most of my dinnerware is glass, and while I've never had any washing&nbsp;issues using my cheapskate store brand powder,

00:12:13.706 --> 00:12:20.159
I did notice the glass seemed to be a little bit&nbsp;
clearer after using the Green Llama formulation.

00:12:20.159 --> 00:12:23.704
And just a single run through the dishwasher with&nbsp;this stuff

00:12:23.704 --> 00:12:30.733
cleared up a faint ring of white hazing that had 
built up on the sides of that same bean&nbsp;dip pan over time.

00:12:30.733 --> 00:12:36.521
I truly did not expect that, and I wish I had taken a 
photo of that hazing&nbsp;before I made the dip.

00:12:36.521 --> 00:12:40.031
This really does a fantastic job at cleaning.

00:12:40.031 --> 00:12:41.817
And you know what's&nbsp;even better?

00:12:41.817 --> 00:12:44.698
Because this is a loose powder,

00:12:44.698 --> 00:12:51.076
if you want to try and use different amounts of&nbsp;detergent based on how dirty your dishes actually are -

00:12:51.076 --> 00:12:53.096
YOU CAN!

00:12:53.496 --> 00:12:56.315
The standard dose is just a single&nbsp;tablespoon,

00:12:56.315 --> 00:13:03.373
which as independent testing has confirmed is just as good as the most premium pod&nbsp;products out there.

00:13:03.373 --> 00:13:08.990
But you may very well not need that much 
all the time, or perhaps ever!

00:13:08.990 --> 00:13:12.492
Maybe&nbsp;you've got soft water 
which makes detergents more effective.

00:13:12.492 --> 00:13:18.863
Or perhaps you've got a particularly good dishwasher model 
that just doesn't need so much detergent no matter what.

00:13:18.863 --> 00:13:21.490
Or even if you're&nbsp;not in either of those boats,

00:13:21.490 --> 00:13:28.856
perhaps tonight's load of dishes just isn't that dirty and won't&nbsp;need a whole pod's worth of detergent.

00:13:28.856 --> 00:13:31.312
That's why I like loose powders.

00:13:31.312 --> 00:13:34.143
You're in control of how&nbsp;much detergent you use!

00:13:34.143 --> 00:13:37.358
Not some executive at some 
company who thinks they know what's best for

00:13:37.358 --> 00:13:40.849
your&nbsp;dishwasher and your water supply 
and what you're washing right now.

00:13:40.849 --> 00:13:44.554
And if you've been persuaded&nbsp;
by the power of the pre-wash, why, of course,

00:13:44.640 --> 00:13:45.990
you can do that, too.

00:13:45.990 --> 00:13:53.163
In fact, you could split&nbsp;the single tablespoon into three teaspoons: use one in the pre-wash and two for the main wash.

00:13:53.163 --> 00:13:57.560
That might very well work better for you than putting 
the whole tablespoon in the dispenser,

00:13:57.560 --> 00:14:00.640
especially when you're washing greasy, oily stuff.

00:14:01.200 --> 00:14:07.367
So, obviously part of why I'm telling you about&nbsp;this new detergent product is because it's&nbsp;available for sale.

00:14:07.367 --> 00:14:13.363
And as a Good Store product,&nbsp;all of the profit from its sales 
will be donated to the Coral Reef Alliance.

00:14:13.363 --> 00:14:17.276
There are links in the&nbsp;description and the pinned comment which will take you to its product page,

00:14:17.276 --> 00:14:18.763
and I hope you check it&nbsp;out.

00:14:18.763 --> 00:14:22.273
I even made an instructional video for those who choose to buy it!

00:14:22.273 --> 00:14:30.719
But the other part of why&nbsp;I'm telling you about this detergent is because its development has proven that powders can be&nbsp;great.

00:14:30.719 --> 00:14:35.995
So good detergents absolutely don't have to be sold like that.

00:14:35.995 --> 00:14:37.382
They don't need pretty colors.

00:14:37.616 --> 00:14:39.299
They don't need fragrances -

00:14:39.299 --> 00:14:44.104
honestly, what is even the point 
of a fragrance in automatic dishwasher&nbsp;detergent?

00:14:44.104 --> 00:14:45.707
They don't need to be pre-dosed.

00:14:45.980 --> 00:14:47.969
They don't need any weird gimmicks.

00:14:47.969 --> 00:14:51.040
And they don't&nbsp;need wasteful packaging.

00:14:51.040 --> 00:14:59.312
I can't stand that in order to buy value quantities of detergent pods,&nbsp;you get a giant plastic tub thrown in for some reason.

00:14:59.312 --> 00:15:02.971
Get this, detergent could just come in a&nbsp;paper bag!

00:15:02.971 --> 00:15:07.768
And even though this one is resealable, 
it's made from compostable materials.

00:15:07.768 --> 00:15:09.184
Pretty neat.

00:15:09.184 --> 00:15:18.200
And let's not forget those detergent pods are often held together by PVA, a kind of dissolvable&nbsp;plastic which uh...

00:15:18.200 --> 00:15:24.466
perhaps we shouldn't be dumping down the drain and into our environment every time&nbsp;we run the dishwasher.

00:15:24.466 --> 00:15:26.733
I get that those products are more convenient.

00:15:26.733 --> 00:15:29.989
I really do, and some folks&nbsp;out there truly need them.

00:15:29.989 --> 00:15:33.253
So, honestly, I'm glad they exist.

00:15:33.253 --> 00:15:37.633
But for what it's worth, Green Llama's&nbsp;
dishwasher tablets also prove

00:15:37.633 --> 00:15:42.740
you don't actually need 
that PVA wrapper to make a pre-dosed product.

00:15:42.740 --> 00:15:48.887
But personally, I will always want to control 
how much detergent I use and how I use it,

00:15:48.887 --> 00:15:53.167
which is&nbsp;why I'm so happy
there's a new powder option out there.

00:15:53.167 --> 00:15:59.622
Thanks so much to Matt for developing this&nbsp;formula 
and of course for sending it to be tested in a lab.

00:15:59.622 --> 00:16:02.960
It's nice to know that the bad powders&nbsp;out there

00:16:02.960 --> 00:16:08.431
are only bad because whoever makes them 
isn't putting their best foot forward.

00:16:08.431 --> 00:16:12.502
And we&nbsp;can only wonder just why exactly that might be.

00:16:12.502 --> 00:16:14.351
All right. And for my next trick,

00:16:14.351 --> 00:16:17.116
it's time&nbsp;to show you why it's so important

00:16:17.116 --> 00:16:25.363
that you open your kitchen faucet and run the hot water until&nbsp;
it's actually coming out piping hot before you start your dishwasher.

00:16:25.363 --> 00:16:31.701
Again, for those of you&nbsp;who live where household voltage 
is 230 volts, you almost certainly don't need to do this.

00:16:31.701 --> 00:16:36.970
But&nbsp;for those of us with 120 volt power on tap, we do.

00:16:36.970 --> 00:16:46.079
Why? Well, with very few exceptions, domestic&nbsp;dishwashers sold here are meant to be hooked up to a hot water supply.

00:16:46.079 --> 00:16:50.416
Usually, it's connected to the&nbsp;
same hot water line as your kitchen faucet.

00:16:50.416 --> 00:16:57.942
And we do this because thanks to our lower voltage,&nbsp;
our dishwashers don't have very powerful heating elements.

00:16:57.942 --> 00:17:01.988
Side note, that's not technically&nbsp;because of our lower voltage.

00:17:01.988 --> 00:17:05.543
Our dishwashers could have 1,500 watt heating elements

00:17:05.543 --> 00:17:11.322
or even 2&nbsp;kilowatt heating elements if they 
were wired to a dedicated 20 amp circuit.

00:17:11.322 --> 00:17:17.173
But dishwashers&nbsp;sold here usually have heating elements 
in the neighborhood of 800 to 1,000 watts.

00:17:17.173 --> 00:17:19.796
And&nbsp;there's a simple and pragmatic reason why.

00:17:20.734 --> 00:17:25.093
See, there are plenty of homes 
that were not built&nbsp;with a dishwasher.

00:17:25.093 --> 00:17:32.454
So, if someone wants to add one later, it's probably going to end up sharing&nbsp;its circuit with something else in the kitchen,

00:17:32.454 --> 00:17:36.749
like the outlets above the countertop or perhaps&nbsp;the refrigerator.

00:17:36.749 --> 00:17:41.184
And so rather than make specific models for retrofits,

00:17:41.184 --> 00:17:47.512
manufacturers limit the&nbsp;current consumption 
of all their dishwashers to something like 10 amps.

00:17:47.512 --> 00:17:51.628
This gives some overhead&nbsp;
which reduces nuisance trips of circuit breakers,

00:17:51.628 --> 00:17:58.385
but it means North American dishwashers 
just&nbsp;aren't very fast at heating the water inside of them.

00:17:58.385 --> 00:18:04.093
But if they fill with water that's already&nbsp;hot, 
then the heating element gets a head start.

00:18:04.160 --> 00:18:07.502
That's the entire reason they're hooked up to&nbsp;hot water.

00:18:07.502 --> 00:18:14.059
However, they won't necessarily get hot water when you start the machine unless you've&nbsp;purged the pipes

00:18:14.059 --> 00:18:20.090
between your water heater and the kitchen faucet of the cold water that's currently&nbsp;resting in them.

00:18:20.090 --> 00:18:26.375
That's what I'm telling you to do when I say "run the kitchen faucet until the water&nbsp;comes out piping hot."

00:18:26.375 --> 00:18:31.734
That will clear the cold water 
from the line before the dishwasher starts&nbsp;filling itself.

00:18:31.734 --> 00:18:34.274
And just in case you think I'm making that up,

00:18:34.274 --> 00:18:39.529
here is that exact advice 
in the&nbsp;owner's manual of this Frigidaire dishwasher.

00:18:39.529 --> 00:18:43.961
How important this is to do 
depends on your dishwasher&nbsp;and your home.

00:18:43.961 --> 00:18:48.862
But this is the only way 
to get consistent performance out of your machine.

00:18:48.862 --> 00:18:54.035
Otherwise, it may start filling 
or completely fill with room temperature water,

00:18:54.035 --> 00:18:58.846
which not only&nbsp;defeats the point 
of being hooked up to hot water in the first place,

00:18:58.846 --> 00:19:04.300
but more importantly will&nbsp;
dramatically hurt its cleaning performance.

00:19:04.300 --> 00:19:07.538
And it hurts cleaning performance in two ways.

00:19:07.538 --> 00:19:14.368
First,&nbsp;many food soils need the help of high temperatures to soften and detach from what they're stuck to.

00:19:14.368 --> 00:19:17.528
That's why you use hot water when handwashing.

00:19:17.528 --> 00:19:24.014
But dishwashers especially need hot water 
because of&nbsp;how modern detergent products work.

00:19:24.014 --> 00:19:28.583
The phaseout of phosphates from automatic dishwasher detergent&nbsp;was a messy ordeal

00:19:28.583 --> 00:19:34.967
and there was a brief period of time 
where dishwasher detergents really were&nbsp;pretty awful.

00:19:34.967 --> 00:19:38.232
Some folks are still hung up about that.

00:19:38.232 --> 00:19:46.485
But modern detergents use enzymes, usually&nbsp;protease and amylase, which chemically break down starches and proteins.

00:19:46.485 --> 00:19:53.545
In a sense, those enzymes&nbsp;digest the food on your plates and stuff and allow it to dissolve into the water.

00:19:53.545 --> 00:20:00.641
However, in&nbsp;order for those enzymes to be maximally effective, the washing water needs to be quite hot,

00:20:00.641 --> 00:20:05.084
ideally&nbsp;60° C or 140° F.

00:20:05.084 --> 00:20:11.094
And here's where the trouble lies: 
if your dishwasher doesn't actually fill with hot&nbsp;water,

00:20:11.094 --> 00:20:18.229
then because of its slow heating element, it may not be able to reach that temperature&nbsp;before it drains the wash water away

00:20:18.229 --> 00:20:20.116
and moves on to rinsing.

00:20:20.116 --> 00:20:26.846
Or even if it does make it,&nbsp;it may very well 
spend less time washing at the optimal temperatures

00:20:26.846 --> 00:20:30.682
before its wash&nbsp;program calls for moving to the next step.

00:20:30.682 --> 00:20:33.803
And with the help of my trusty temperature data&nbsp;loggers,

00:20:33.803 --> 00:20:38.470
a plastic bag, some rubber bands, a zip tie, 
and a dishwasher with a hole in its side,

00:20:38.470 --> 00:20:43.405
I&nbsp;can show you the difference 
between a dishwasher which fills with room temperature water

00:20:43.405 --> 00:20:47.266
and a&nbsp;dishwasher that fills with hot water.

00:20:47.266 --> 00:20:53.355
I hooked ol' Fridgy up to this utility sink using an adapter,&nbsp;
basically turning it into a portable dishwasher.

00:20:53.355 --> 00:20:57.128
Which by the way, did you know those exist?

00:20:57.128 --> 00:20:59.088
I don't mean a countertop dishwasher.

00:20:59.088 --> 00:21:01.412
I mean a full-size dishwasher.

00:21:01.412 --> 00:21:06.067
You can buy a machine&nbsp;much like this 
but encased in a box on wheels

00:21:06.067 --> 00:21:09.805
and which uses an attachment to hook it up to a&nbsp;kitchen faucet.

00:21:09.805 --> 00:21:15.244
If you don't have a dishwasher but would like one, 
those are an option&nbsp;worth looking into.

00:21:15.244 --> 00:21:17.861
My grandparents had one, and it worked great!

00:21:17.861 --> 00:21:24.981
Just roll it over to the&nbsp;sink and hook up the combined fill and drain hose thing to the faucet using the adapter it&nbsp;comes with,

00:21:24.981 --> 00:21:29.044
plug the machine into a power outlet,
 set the faucet to hot water

00:21:29.044 --> 00:21:33.421
(and purge the line of&nbsp;course, which you can do with a little button on the adapter thing)

00:21:33.421 --> 00:21:35.577
and then start the machine.

00:21:35.577 --> 00:21:40.384
Those of you who insist on 
handwashing really seem quite funny to me

00:21:40.384 --> 00:21:46.542
when put in contrast to&nbsp;what my grandma did 
every day specifically to avoid washing dishes.

00:21:46.542 --> 00:21:53.754
Anyway, because I had it&nbsp;hooked up to a faucet, I could choose whether the machine would fill with hot or cold water.

00:21:53.754 --> 00:21:59.291
And&nbsp;I devised a test using a food 
which really needs hot water to be dealt with effectively:

00:21:59.291 --> 00:22:00.430
Peanut&nbsp;butter.

00:22:00.430 --> 00:22:02.594
And a whole lot of it.

00:22:02.594 --> 00:22:09.102
I melted almost half a jar's worth of peanut butter and swirled it&nbsp;
around in a series of mason jars and glass mugs

00:22:09.102 --> 00:22:12.142
to completely coat them in delicious goop.

00:22:12.142 --> 00:22:16.421
And then&nbsp;I let it all cool 
back to room temperature so it resolidified.

00:22:16.421 --> 00:22:20.652
I hope you'll pardon the food&nbsp;
waste when you see how well this demo worked.

00:22:20.652 --> 00:22:26.578
In addition to the peanut butter, I also melted&nbsp;some regular butter and swirled it around in the same glass mugs.

00:22:26.578 --> 00:22:33.176
Some went on the top rack&nbsp;and others went on the bottom rack where they'd be visible to the camera peering in through the&nbsp;glass.

00:22:33.176 --> 00:22:37.194
Also present were a couple of plates coated in honey.

00:22:37.194 --> 00:22:43.921
Being fresh, I didn't really think that&nbsp;was going to be a problem for cold water, but I decided to try it anyway.

00:22:43.921 --> 00:22:50.663
Throughout this testing,&nbsp;a temperature logging device was positioned directly above the center of the lower spray arm.

00:22:50.663 --> 00:22:53.566
I would have liked it to be sitting in the water,

00:22:53.566 --> 00:22:57.854
but the design of this machine's 
spray arm made that&nbsp;not so possible.

00:22:57.854 --> 00:23:02.102
Now, for this test, I did not use any pre-wash detergent.

00:23:02.102 --> 00:23:05.269
At least... the first two&nbsp;times I ran the test.

00:23:05.269 --> 00:23:06.228
We'll get there.

00:23:06.228 --> 00:23:10.415
However, the machine's 
detergent dispenser was filled with&nbsp;detergent -

00:23:10.415 --> 00:23:12.745
in this case, a store brand product.

00:23:12.745 --> 00:23:16.899
I didn't use Matt's formulation 
because at the&nbsp;time I didn't have enough left.

00:23:16.899 --> 00:23:21.465
But to be honest, even if I did, 
I wouldn't want to waste it on&nbsp;this nonsense.

00:23:21.465 --> 00:23:28.687
So, with everything in place, I set the faucet to cold 
and started the machine&nbsp;on its normal wash program.

00:23:28.687 --> 00:23:32.264
Once full of water, it began its 15-minute pre-wash.

00:23:32.264 --> 00:23:36.128
But because this&nbsp;machine doesn't 
turn on the heating element during the pre-wash,

00:23:36.128 --> 00:23:41.606
that meant it spent 15 minutes&nbsp;"washing" with cold water.

00:23:41.606 --> 00:23:46.483
Some of the peanut butter did manage to get knocked off by the mechanical action of the water.

00:23:46.483 --> 00:23:47.932
And though it took a while,

00:23:48.000 --> 00:23:53.040
the butter in the bottom of the mug on&nbsp;
the bottom rack was eventually dislodged.

00:23:53.040 --> 00:23:54.927
But not much else happened.

00:23:54.927 --> 00:23:57.100
Once it had finished&nbsp;draining the pre-wash water,

00:23:57.100 --> 00:24:03.103
I opened the machine to take a peek at the top rack, and everything&nbsp;up there looked completely untouched.

00:24:03.103 --> 00:24:09.657
The honey, though, did all dissolve and got pumped&nbsp;away, so there probably wasn't a point to including that.

00:24:09.657 --> 00:24:11.459
Oh well, live and learn.

00:24:11.459 --> 00:24:16.331
Once I closed the door and the cycle resumed, 
the machine did its little purging and rinsing&nbsp;dance

00:24:16.331 --> 00:24:23.222
then filled again with cold water, switched on its heating element, resumed washing,&nbsp;and opened the detergent dispenser.

00:24:23.222 --> 00:24:26.654
The water inside is still just at room temperature,

00:24:26.654 --> 00:24:32.447
so&nbsp;while we now have the help of detergent, 
we don't yet have the help of any heat.

00:24:32.447 --> 00:24:37.972
And because the&nbsp;heating element in this machine 
is only putting 900 watts of heat output into the water,

00:24:37.972 --> 00:24:44.002
it took&nbsp;quite a long time for the peanut butter 
to start softening and for the detergent to get to work.

00:24:44.002 --> 00:24:47.289
Though it did eventually all clear up.

00:24:47.289 --> 00:24:52.031
The water was absolutely filthy 
with all that peanut butter&nbsp;and actual butter in it,

00:24:52.031 --> 00:24:57.111
but the machine was just barely 
able to get it all off before it started draining.

00:24:57.111 --> 00:25:02.312
Now, I needed to do this test again 
so I let the machine finish the wash cycle.

00:25:02.312 --> 00:25:09.035
It didn't do a very good job of rinsing, which I wasn't super surprised by given the&nbsp;ridiculous amount of peanut butter in there.

00:25:09.035 --> 00:25:11.912
So, I had to do a rinse only cycle afterwards.

00:25:11.912 --> 00:25:15.005
But once&nbsp;everything was clean, I reset the test.

00:25:15.005 --> 00:25:22.129
I tried to make this as consistent with the last test as&nbsp;possible,
and I put everything exactly where it was in the first test.

00:25:22.129 --> 00:25:29.494
I even put honey in there&nbsp;again just in case it was somehow doing something to affect how well things dissolved or not.

00:25:29.494 --> 00:25:32.745
But&nbsp;this time I switched the faucet to hot water

00:25:32.745 --> 00:25:38.996
and I disconnected the hose and purged the line of&nbsp;cold water before reconnecting it and starting the machine

00:25:38.996 --> 00:25:43.969
which made sure the water 
which entered&nbsp;was actually piping hot.

00:25:43.969 --> 00:25:48.960
If you're wondering why there's a whole bunch of other stuff in the&nbsp;dishwasher alongside what's actually dirty,

00:25:48.960 --> 00:25:55.899
well this was to make sure the test is representative&nbsp;of the actual conditions a dishwasher typically sees.

00:25:55.899 --> 00:26:02.098
The gallon-ish of hot water that it's about&nbsp;to take in 
doesn't have that much heat energy in it,

00:26:02.098 --> 00:26:07.622
and all those plates (and the dishwasher&nbsp;itself) 
have quite a lot of thermal mass.

00:26:07.622 --> 00:26:13.076
So, I wanted to know how much the water would be&nbsp;cooled down by all that stuff.

00:26:13.076 --> 00:26:18.051
Or put another way, how much 
heating the incoming water actually&nbsp;does.

00:26:18.051 --> 00:26:24.679
And, well, after it drained this water out, 
I measured its temperature at just under 81°.

00:26:24.679 --> 00:26:28.268
That's about 14° above the ambient temperature.

00:26:28.268 --> 00:26:34.193
That may not seem that significant, 
but now that&nbsp;everything inside is already at 81°

00:26:34.193 --> 00:26:39.517
we've given the main wash at least 
a 10-minute head start when&nbsp;
it comes to heating -

00:26:39.517 --> 00:26:44.318
if not more, depending on how hot the next fill of water is.

00:26:44.318 --> 00:26:47.647
That's going to&nbsp;depend on your home's particularities.

00:26:47.647 --> 00:26:55.667
15 minutes have passed since it last filled with water, so&nbsp;
the water resting in the pipes will have cooled down a fair bit.

00:26:55.667 --> 00:27:02.545
Here, the lil' baby water&nbsp;heater, which is supplying the dishwasher with hot water is right next to the sink.

00:27:02.545 --> 00:27:06.739
So, I'll&nbsp;note that it's going to fill again with pretty hot water,

00:27:06.739 --> 00:27:11.561
and it's probably got a bit of an advantage&nbsp;here 
compared to most installations.

00:27:11.561 --> 00:27:15.448
Regardless, let's take a side by side look at how this goes.

00:27:15.448 --> 00:27:21.026
This is a time lapse which ended up causing some 
flashing light effects, so here's your&nbsp;warning for that.

00:27:21.026 --> 00:27:24.613
I'll let you know when it's off screen by saying "persnickety."

00:27:24.613 --> 00:27:28.228
During the pre-wash, we&nbsp;don't actually see much of a difference.

00:27:28.228 --> 00:27:32.306
In fact, the cold fill side appears to be doing slightly&nbsp;better

00:27:32.306 --> 00:27:38.612
since we are not seeing the peanut butter get dislodged from the bottom of the mason jars&nbsp;like we were before.

00:27:38.612 --> 00:27:45.317
But we do see that the pad of butter was dislodged 
much more quickly from&nbsp;the mug on the hot fill side

00:27:45.317 --> 00:27:50.833
thanks to the blasts of warm water helping 
it to soften and detach&nbsp;from the glass.

00:27:50.833 --> 00:27:55.575
However, once we move on to the main wash 
and the detergent dispenser opens,

00:27:55.575 --> 00:27:58.063
the&nbsp;difference is dramatic.

00:27:58.063 --> 00:28:02.272
While nothing seems to be happening yet on the cold fill side,

00:28:02.272 --> 00:28:09.399
the detergent&nbsp;and the water immediately gets to work melting and dissolving the peanut butter on the hot fill&nbsp;side.

00:28:09.399 --> 00:28:13.904
My temperature logger reacts fairly slowly 
to sudden changes in temperature,

00:28:13.904 --> 00:28:16.970
but based on&nbsp;the similarity in the curve shapes here,

00:28:16.970 --> 00:28:21.627
I would estimate that the 
wash water was immediately&nbsp;at about 95°,

00:28:21.627 --> 00:28:23.850
whereas on the cold fill side,

00:28:23.920 --> 00:28:29.285
the water is only just now 
starting to move above&nbsp;room temperature.

00:28:29.285 --> 00:28:38.240
In fact, by the time the data logger was reading 100° on the hot fill side,&nbsp;the cold fill side was only reading about 78°.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:28:38.800 --> 00:28:42.933
That's why nothing 
seemed to be happening for&nbsp;such a long time.

00:28:42.933 --> 00:28:46.698
The upshot here is that when the machine filled with hot water,

00:28:46.698 --> 00:28:55.134
it had completely&nbsp;finished getting the peanut butter off the jars and stuff about 20 minutes earlier than when it&nbsp;filled with cold water.

00:28:55.134 --> 00:28:56.153
Persnickety.

00:28:56.153 --> 00:29:02.685
And because this machine always spends the same amount of time in this part of the washing cycle before it drains,

00:29:02.685 --> 00:29:12.260
this means the actually effective washing time was&nbsp;extended by 20 minutes simply by filling with hot water rather than cold.

00:29:12.260 --> 00:29:18.098
That could very well be&nbsp;the difference between 
perfectly clean dishes and disappointment.

00:29:18.098 --> 00:29:21.578
But before I show you what adding&nbsp;
a little pre-wash detergent did,

00:29:21.578 --> 00:29:25.947
you may have noticed something about where the temperatures&nbsp;peaked.

00:29:25.947 --> 00:29:30.770
This testing revealed something about this dishwasher 
which I honestly didn't expect

00:29:30.770 --> 00:29:36.570
and assuming others out there are like it makes it 
even more important that you do that whole

00:29:36.570 --> 00:29:41.035
"run&nbsp;the tap until the water comes out hot" 
thing I keep harping on about.

00:29:41.035 --> 00:29:44.034
This machine is controlled&nbsp;by a microprocessor,

00:29:44.034 --> 00:29:50.505
and when I made my first videos with it and discovered that there were two&nbsp;temperature sensing devices below the washtub,

00:29:50.505 --> 00:29:56.439
I figured one of them would be a thermistor or some&nbsp;other temperature sensor that the control board is monitoring

00:29:56.439 --> 00:30:00.206
to make sure it attains a target&nbsp;temperature.

00:30:00.206 --> 00:30:07.336
But these two temperature graphs suggest the machine is simply running its heating&nbsp;element for a fixed period of time.

00:30:07.336 --> 00:30:14.050
When it filled with cold water, it didn't even hit 120 Fahrenheit&nbsp;before it switched off the heating element.

00:30:14.050 --> 00:30:18.875
It actually got hotter during the final rinse 
than it&nbsp;ever did in the main wash.

00:30:18.875 --> 00:30:23.491
With a hot water fill, it peaked slightly above 130 Fahrenheit,

00:30:23.491 --> 00:30:28.709
but you&nbsp;can see that the heating element 
switched off at precisely the same time.

00:30:28.709 --> 00:30:35.620
I figured the cold&nbsp;fill wash would run the heating element longer, but since it apparently didn't...

00:30:35.620 --> 00:30:43.373
well, you really,&nbsp;really need to purge the cold water from the line for this thing's normal wash cycle to do a good&nbsp;job.

00:30:43.373 --> 00:30:46.153
But this machine has more than just one cycle.

00:30:46.153 --> 00:30:53.500
In fact, it offers four different&nbsp;wash cycles with two 
optional modifiers: high temp wash and sanitize.

00:30:53.500 --> 00:31:00.595
And I wanted to&nbsp;see how the heating element's behavior might change using those other cycles and options.

00:31:00.595 --> 00:31:08.169
So,&nbsp;I decided to wire an indicator light in parallel with the heating element so I could record what&nbsp;it's doing.

00:31:08.169 --> 00:31:13.342
And then I thought, 
why don't I add indicators for everything else it does?

00:31:13.342 --> 00:31:16.283
So, I&nbsp;gave the machine some blinkenlights!

00:31:16.283 --> 00:31:19.406
I wasn't expecting to install them in the control panel&nbsp;like this,

00:31:19.406 --> 00:31:23.058
but when I opened it up to get 
access to the detergent dispenser's wiring,

00:31:23.058 --> 00:31:28.299
I realized&nbsp;there was clearance 
below the vent and... well, I couldn't resist.

00:31:28.299 --> 00:31:31.740
We can now see exactly what&nbsp;
the machine is actually doing:

00:31:31.740 --> 00:31:36.418
Filling with water, draining that water out, running its wash&nbsp;
pump, dispensing detergent,

00:31:36.418 --> 00:31:40.832
and of course, 
the thing I mostly did this for, heating the&nbsp;water.

00:31:40.832 --> 00:31:45.922
And in a more than slightly annoying twist, 
while I was inside the control panel

00:31:45.922 --> 00:31:51.913
I discovered a little sheet of paper clipped to the 
stainless steel on the inside of the&nbsp;door panel.

00:31:51.913 --> 00:31:53.787
I took it out and...

00:31:53.787 --> 00:31:56.771
whaddya know, a service data sheet!

00:31:56.771 --> 00:32:02.800
It's got a wiring diagram,&nbsp;an exploded parts diagram 
on the back, and some troubleshooting stuff.

00:32:02.800 --> 00:32:09.401
And it also has charts&nbsp;which 
explain what all the cycles do and when.

00:32:11.120 --> 00:32:12.628
I wish I knew that was in there -

00:32:12.628 --> 00:32:16.258
and honestly, all&nbsp;appliances 
should come with something like this. It's great!

00:32:16.258 --> 00:32:19.815
Maybe don't hide it inside&nbsp;the door next time.

00:32:19.815 --> 00:32:26.024
Anyway, with this, I confirmed there is in fact a 
thermistor which&nbsp;the control board is monitoring, but...

00:32:26.024 --> 00:32:33.652
it only actually uses it to control the heating element 
if&nbsp;you select the sanitize or high temp wash options.

00:32:33.652 --> 00:32:41.391
If you don't, it simply heats the water for a&nbsp;predetermined period of time depending on which cycle you chose.

00:32:41.391 --> 00:32:45.427
That seemed kind of strange, but&nbsp;
here's where things get weirder.

00:32:45.427 --> 00:32:50.763
The high temp wash option doesn't simply make the wash a high temp&nbsp;
wash.

00:32:50.763 --> 00:32:52.070
That's what you'd think, right?

00:32:52.070 --> 00:32:53.528
That's what it says.

00:32:53.528 --> 00:32:58.114
But in fact, it wildly changes the normal&nbsp;wash sequence.

00:32:58.114 --> 00:33:00.919
Select that modifier and you get not one,

00:33:00.919 --> 00:33:01.876
not two,

00:33:01.876 --> 00:33:02.926
not three,

00:33:02.926 --> 00:33:08.227
but four pre-washes,&nbsp;
the last of which is actually heated, too.

00:33:08.227 --> 00:33:14.816
So, you get a half hour of pre-washing 
with four water&nbsp;changes before the main wash even starts.

00:33:14.816 --> 00:33:23.648
And with the final pre-wash also heated, everything inside&nbsp;
is already at about 110° when the dispenser opens.

00:33:23.648 --> 00:33:28.373
This obviously uses much more water, but it&nbsp;
makes the main wash extremely effective

00:33:28.373 --> 00:33:32.322
and gives those enzymes lots of time to go to town.

00:33:32.322 --> 00:33:40.000
Plus, at the end of the cycle, you also get two complete rinses rather than the one and a half you&nbsp;get otherwise.

00:33:40.000 --> 00:33:44.358
When it does that purging dance, 
which it apparently claims is a pre-rinse,

00:33:44.358 --> 00:33:47.434
it never&nbsp;sends any water to the top sprayers.

00:33:47.434 --> 00:33:52.798
So, whatever residual dirty water is left from the main wash&nbsp;inside the two upper spray arms

00:33:52.798 --> 00:33:58.417
and the tubing which feeds them 
is gonna end up in the final&nbsp;rinse.

00:33:58.417 --> 00:34:04.640
Honestly, this machine's unmodified 
normal wash cycle... is not very good.

00:34:04.640 --> 00:34:10.318
It washes okay,&nbsp;assuming you purged the line 
of cold water, but rinsing leaves a lot to be desired.

00:34:10.318 --> 00:34:16.338
Oh, and fun&nbsp;fact, you know how much energy the 
energy saver cycle saves over the normal cycle?

00:34:16.338 --> 00:34:18.614
Turns out none&nbsp;at all!

00:34:18.614 --> 00:34:21.479
And it uses more water.

00:34:21.479 --> 00:34:23.003
So that's neat.

00:34:23.003 --> 00:34:27.411
The moral of this story is 
since the cycles are so&nbsp;wildly different,

00:34:27.411 --> 00:34:33.616
if you haven't yet, you really need to try 
the other cycles and options on your&nbsp;machine.

00:34:33.616 --> 00:34:40.138
If you've been having residue issues, other cycles may very well do extra rinses which&nbsp;will take care of that.

00:34:40.138 --> 00:34:45.816
And if your machine is on the older side and enzyme-based detergents weren't&nbsp;common when it was made,

00:34:45.816 --> 00:34:53.772
those heavier wash options might be the only way to assure the water&nbsp;actually reaches optimal enzymatic temperatures.

00:34:53.772 --> 00:34:56.437
I'm going to talk more about this on my second&nbsp;channel

00:34:56.437 --> 00:35:01.529
because I've uncovered a lot about 
this dishwasher which isn't even on these charts.

00:35:01.529 --> 00:35:06.371
For&nbsp;instance, I was also curious whether the 
delay start option would change its heating behavior.

00:35:06.371 --> 00:35:08.108
Spoiler:

00:35:08.108 --> 00:35:09.096
nope.

00:35:09.096 --> 00:35:12.673
And some of its cycles and options are not listed here.

00:35:12.673 --> 00:35:16.419
I'll also show you the peanut&nbsp;
butter test with the high temp wash option.

00:35:16.419 --> 00:35:18.668
It made a dramatic difference.

00:35:18.668 --> 00:35:21.952
But this video has already&nbsp;gotten 
quite a bit longer than I anticipated,

00:35:21.952 --> 00:35:26.189
so I'm going to finish up with 
the third time I ran&nbsp;the peanut butter test.

00:35:26.189 --> 00:35:32.724
This time, I included just a single teaspoon of 
Matt's marvelous&nbsp;detergent formula for the pre-wash water.

00:35:33.440 --> 00:35:38.880
Okay, it was a bit of a heaping teaspoon, but this&nbsp;
is well less than half the standard washing dose.&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:35:38.880 --> 00:35:42.820
And I simply placed it on the door and let it fall&nbsp;inside.

00:35:42.820 --> 00:35:48.194
I started the machine on the unmodified normal cycle again with the hot water line purged.

00:35:48.194 --> 00:35:55.033
And the first thing you'll notice is that the butter was dislodged much, much faster with some&nbsp;detergent in the water.

00:35:55.033 --> 00:35:59.454
In fact, the sides of the mug cleared up almost immediately.

00:35:59.454 --> 00:36:03.493
Now, the&nbsp;rest of what the pre-wash detergent did is a little more subtle,

00:36:03.493 --> 00:36:05.773
but it's pretty evident in the&nbsp;time lapse.

00:36:05.773 --> 00:36:09.466
Again, flashing lights ahead, 
and I'll say persnickety when they're gone.

00:36:09.466 --> 00:36:16.876
As the pre-wash&nbsp;continues, we see the water start to get much cloudier with the addition of pre-wash detergent.

00:36:16.876 --> 00:36:24.635
Even with just this tiny amount, the detergent is allowing the water to absorb the fats in both&nbsp;types of butter immediately.

00:36:24.635 --> 00:36:27.428
And that's why we're seeing it start to get cloudy -

00:36:27.428 --> 00:36:30.877
it's actually&nbsp;starting to dissolve those butters.

00:36:30.877 --> 00:36:33.838
Yet, nothing else about this wash is any different.

00:36:33.838 --> 00:36:38.736
In fact,&nbsp;the temperature graph is pretty much identical to the last demo.

00:36:38.736 --> 00:36:42.911
Now, admittedly, it doesn't look&nbsp;
like a dramatic difference in this footage.

00:36:42.911 --> 00:36:47.132
But if we look at the water which was drained out of&nbsp;the machine at the end of the pre-wash,

00:36:47.132 --> 00:36:53.472
persnickety, the addition of detergent 
clearly increased how&nbsp;much peanut butter was drained out.

00:36:53.472 --> 00:36:56.938
The water is much cloudier and more uniform.

00:36:56.938 --> 00:37:00.419
Without the&nbsp;detergent, a good deal of stuff came out,

00:37:00.419 --> 00:37:06.812
but the water was a fair bit clearer, and what managed&nbsp;to make it out were more like chunks than anything else.

00:37:06.812 --> 00:37:11.654
I opened the door once it was finished&nbsp;
draining the pre-wash water to check out the top rack.

00:37:11.654 --> 00:37:14.921
And here, too, we see a pretty significant&nbsp;difference.

00:37:14.921 --> 00:37:19.104
Stuff on the top rack doesn't get sprayed 
for several minutes into the pre-wash,

00:37:19.104 --> 00:37:23.842
so the water cools down quite a bit 
before stuff up here gets a good spraying.

00:37:23.842 --> 00:37:31.881
Still, in a first,&nbsp;both mugs of butter had the big pad dislodged with only a small ring remaining on one of them.

00:37:31.881 --> 00:37:37.120
And if we check on the bottom of the machine, we can see that although some of the butter remains&nbsp;inside,

00:37:37.120 --> 00:37:39.680
it's all been broken down into chunks.

00:37:40.480 --> 00:37:45.600
I am very annoyed with myself because I forgot to&nbsp;
check the bottom of the machine for what the butter&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:37:45.600 --> 00:37:51.592
that fell out of the mugs looked like when I&nbsp;ran the test the second time with hot water&nbsp;but without pre-wash detergent.

00:37:51.592 --> 00:37:53.377
So, my apologies&nbsp;there.

00:37:53.377 --> 00:37:55.711
However, another flashing light warning,

00:37:55.711 --> 00:38:00.195
if we go back to the time lapse, we can see that&nbsp;during the main wash,

00:38:00.195 --> 00:38:05.617
the water was much dirtier 
in the fill with only a single dose of detergent.

00:38:05.617 --> 00:38:09.167
While the pre-wash detergent certainly didn't get everything out,

00:38:09.167 --> 00:38:14.956
I think it's clear from this&nbsp;footage that it made a significant difference to how much food soil was left

00:38:14.956 --> 00:38:17.605
when the main wash&nbsp;detergent was released.

00:38:17.605 --> 00:38:21.402
And that's the entire reason I like to use pre-wash detergent!

00:38:21.402 --> 00:38:26.357
Taking&nbsp;the same amount of detergent and 
spreading its work between two fills of water

00:38:26.357 --> 00:38:30.792
is often more&nbsp;effective 
than asking it to do everything all at once.

00:38:30.792 --> 00:38:32.107
Persnickety.

00:38:32.107 --> 00:38:39.985
I don't always use pre-wash&nbsp;detergent to be clear, but if I've got anything in the dishwasher which is oily or fatty or greasy,

00:38:39.985 --> 00:38:46.643
I will be sure to add some additional detergent so the main wash fill doesn't have to deal with all&nbsp;of that on its own.

00:38:46.643 --> 00:38:50.295
Remember how the butter was dislodged so much faster?

00:38:50.295 --> 00:38:54.837
It took a little over&nbsp;5 minutes for it to get knocked out of the mug without pre-wash detergent,

00:38:54.837 --> 00:38:59.266
but it only took about&nbsp;60 seconds 
when there was some soap in the water.

00:38:59.266 --> 00:39:04.133
It's almost like detergents 
help fats to mix with&nbsp;water or something!

00:39:04.133 --> 00:39:09.284
Now, I didn't do the best job being consistent 
with how much butter was in the&nbsp;bottom mug,

00:39:09.284 --> 00:39:13.196
so here's a teaser of the high temp 
wash test that you'll find on my second channel.

00:39:13.196 --> 00:39:19.791
I put way more butter in this mug, and still it only took 
70 seconds for the butter to start to&nbsp;release,

00:39:19.791 --> 00:39:24.236
and just a few more spins of the sprayer 
were all it took for the rest to come out.

00:39:24.236 --> 00:39:27.729
If this&nbsp;doesn't convince you, I don't know what could.

00:39:27.729 --> 00:39:31.027
And now that someone has 
developed a powdered&nbsp;detergent product

00:39:31.027 --> 00:39:37.964
which doesn't have to fit into an overly complicated product lineup which needs&nbsp;to justify wildly different price points somehow,

00:39:37.964 --> 00:39:43.923
we know that there's absolutely no reason you&nbsp;
should not be able to get the freedom of powder

00:39:43.923 --> 00:39:46.503
without sacrificing washing performance.

00:39:46.503 --> 00:39:51.315
Powders don't have to be relegated 
to a sad spot on the bottom shelf of the store.

00:39:51.315 --> 00:39:55.052
They could in fact be a premium product.

00:39:55.052 --> 00:39:58.122
So, thank you so much to everyone who worked&nbsp;on this project,

00:39:58.122 --> 00:40:00.342
but especially Matt Keasey.

00:40:00.342 --> 00:40:03.460
If one person can develop a detergent formulation

00:40:03.460 --> 00:40:11.286
which works just as well as what the big guys have convinced so many people is the only way to&nbsp;get a good wash...

00:40:11.286 --> 00:40:16.741
Well, I'll just say perhaps those 
stubborn, crotchety Midwesterners out there

00:40:16.741 --> 00:40:20.085
might&nbsp;have a point about marketing gimmicks.

00:40:21.269 --> 00:40:23.821
♫ vindicatedly smooth jazz ♫

00:40:24.925 --> 00:40:27.238
I was right!

00:40:28.566 --> 00:40:30.271
Why might that be?

00:40:30.271 --> 00:40:31.665
Weird vocal flub.

00:40:32.017 --> 00:40:33.921
Oh no. Is that a leaf blower?

00:40:33.921 --> 00:40:35.269
On Friday?

00:40:35.269 --> 00:40:38.275
We will patiently wait for the leaf blowering to stop.

00:40:38.275 --> 00:40:43.558
I&nbsp;strongly prefer loose powders for dishwashers... 
[thud]

00:40:45.394 --> 00:40:48.739
Are they leaf blowing on the roof?

00:40:48.739 --> 00:40:50.067
They might&nbsp;be.

00:40:50.067 --> 00:40:53.626
And that's the entire reason I like to use main -

00:40:54.446 --> 00:40:55.149
gah!

00:40:55.149 --> 00:40:59.025
I'm going to finish up with the&nbsp;
third time I ran the peanut butter test.

00:41:02.590 --> 00:41:03.612
FFAAH[bleep]

00:41:03.612 --> 00:41:05.354
...time I ran the peanut butter test.

00:41:09.065 --> 00:41:09.565
Godd-

00:41:11.518 --> 00:41:15.284
I don't want to hear another word 
about how much better those pods are.

00:41:15.284 --> 00:41:20.847
Or I guess, I don't want to hear another word about how pods are some kind of "innovation" which favors the consumer.

00:41:20.847 --> 00:41:24.642
Because while they might be innovative, 
I don't think it's us who's really benefiting.

00:41:24.642 --> 00:41:25.758
My hat was never tinfoil!

